# Scaling question

**URL:** <https://community.thunkable.com/t/scaling-question/30250>\
**Category:** Questions about Thunkable X\
**Created:** [June 5, 2018, 12:50pm UTC](https://community.thunkable.com/t/scaling-question/30250 "2018-06-05T12:50:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rollke](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/community.thunkable.com/rollke/32/14413_2.png) [@rollke](https://community.thunkable.com/u/rollke)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2018, 12:50pm UTC](https://community.thunkable.com/t/scaling-question/30250/1 "2018-06-05T12:50:01Z")

</div>

What is the difference between “Fill container” and “Relative … 100%”?  
I thought, that filling the container is 100%.  
But the effects are different.  
Could someone explain that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Red\_Panda](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/community.thunkable.com/red_panda/32/19387_2.png) [@Red\_Panda](https://community.thunkable.com/u/Red_Panda)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2018, 12:56pm UTC](https://community.thunkable.com/t/scaling-question/30250/2 "2018-06-05T12:56:46Z")

</div>

How big is the difference? I think in Classic Thunkable there is a small difference between Fill Parent and 100% because the layouts take some pixels for themselves. I would expect them to be the same too

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ioannis](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/community.thunkable.com/ioannis/32/146956_2.png) [@ioannis](https://community.thunkable.com/u/ioannis)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2024, 12:02pm UTC](https://community.thunkable.com/t/scaling-question/30250/3 "2024-11-08T12:02:40Z")

</div>


