# JavaScript Web Bridge missing URL property in block editor

**URL:** <https://community.thunkable.com/t/javascript-web-bridge-missing-url-property-in-block-editor/3538955>\
**Category:** Issues / Bugs\
**Created:** [February 4, 2025, 7:04pm UTC](https://community.thunkable.com/t/javascript-web-bridge-missing-url-property-in-block-editor/3538955 "2025-02-04T19:04:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sketch](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/community.thunkable.com/sketch/32/109058_2.png) [@sketch](https://community.thunkable.com/u/sketch)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2025, 7:04pm UTC](https://community.thunkable.com/t/javascript-web-bridge-missing-url-property-in-block-editor/3538955/1 "2025-02-04T19:04:27Z")

</div>

Hi everyone 👋🏼🤗  
I was messing a bit around with creating some offline capabilities using the JS we bridge but realized I’m not able to do so because I cannot change the url using blocks to the downloaded file using the download file blocks.  
Because the URL property block is missing in Thunkable.

So could this future be added to Thunkable?

Thanks \<3

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![emlee703](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/community.thunkable.com/emlee703/32/165400_2.png) [@emlee703](https://community.thunkable.com/u/emlee703)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2025, 10:18pm UTC](https://community.thunkable.com/t/javascript-web-bridge-missing-url-property-in-block-editor/3538955/2 "2025-02-04T22:18:42Z")

</div>

You’re saying you want a URL property block in Thunkable?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brianl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/f14d63/32.png) [@brianl](https://community.thunkable.com/u/brianl)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2025, 11:47pm UTC](https://community.thunkable.com/t/javascript-web-bridge-missing-url-property-in-block-editor/3538955/3 "2025-02-04T23:47:35Z")

</div>

I can ask. I believe the original purpose was to connect to just one source to be able to use JS. That way, you don’t have to make a super small web viewer to run JS code. Could you tell me more about how you were thinking of using js web bridge with the download file block? Like downloading a HTML file and running that or something along those lines?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sketch](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/community.thunkable.com/sketch/32/109058_2.png) [@sketch](https://community.thunkable.com/u/sketch)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2025, 6:17am UTC](https://community.thunkable.com/t/javascript-web-bridge-missing-url-property-in-block-editor/3538955/4 "2025-02-05T06:17:26Z")

</div>

> [@brianl](#):
>
> I believe the original purpose was to connect to just one source to be able to use JS.

Oh I see I thought it was a bug at first but I suppose it’s a future request then.

> [@brianl](#):
>
> Like downloading a HTML file and running that or something along those lines?

Exactly that, this way I can also use the bridge when I’m offline making it easier to develop fully offline apps that can use JavaScript.

I thought of adding them as assets via Thunkable but figured that would take up alot of space on my account and it would be easier for me to update the code then instead of having to constantly replace it.  
I could just simply automate it using blocks.

I could just download the file on the user’s device, then with a update update the file and then just load that file instead of the url to the site if the user is offline.